BY THE TIME I NOTICED THIS STORY, IT WAS OVER, but Todd Akin’s “legitimate rape” remarks pale in comparison with Whoopi Goldberg’s.So, According to Reynolds, we should give a sitting member of Congress and a member of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology a pass for his comments because two years ago a talk show house said something equally dumb (Yes, Goldberg's comments were dumb, but certainly no dumber than what Rep. Akin said, check for yourself). This is a great example of a red herring as we can clearly see Reynolds attempting to side-track the discussion by introducing an unrelated element into the conversation.
UPDATE: Here’s the Whoopi Goldberg “Rape-Rape” Video.
Similiarly, CNN pundits Dana Loesch and Erik Erikson committed Red Herrings of their own in defense of Akin with Loesch tweeting:
Akin failed a soundbite. McCaskill helped tank the economy. If you think his bad is worse, join the left.And Erickson tweeting:
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) August 19, 2012
Todd Akin said something dumb.Claire McCaskill voted for Obamacare.I'll take a dumb statement over a destructive vote.In both cases, they are committing Red Herrings by trying to distract people from the comment Akin made by introducing a discussion of an unrelated issue. One might still decide to vote for Akin over McCaskill despite his idiotic comments, but neither of the points made are at all relevant to the question of of the truth or falsity of what Akin said.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) August 20, 2012
h/t to Digby
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.